Analisis Komparasi Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Konvensional dan Bank Umum Syariah

Ririn Setyaningsih, Siti Resmi

Abstract


The awareness of the Indonesian public to transact through Syaria banks is increasing. This condition is likely to affect the financial performance of conventional banks and Syaria banks. This study aims to analyze the differences in the financial performance of conventional banks and Syaria banks. The analysis used is based on two approaches, namely based on the ratio ranking criteria according to Regulation No.13/24/DPNP and the statistical approach. The analysis based on the ratio ranking shows that the financial performance of conventional banks is better than Syaria banks, both in terms of risk profile assessment, profitability, and capital. Analysis with a statistical approach includes normality test and difference test. The results of the normality test using One Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov show that the significance value for net performing loan (NPL), loan to deposit ratio (LDR), return on assets (ROA), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is 0.001; 0.225; 0.022; and 0.004. This means that the LDR data is normally distributed, while NPL, ROA and CAR are not normally distributed. Different tests for NPL, ROA and CAR using the Mann Withney test showed that the significance value for the three ratios was 0.000 for each ratio. Different test for LDR using independent sample t-test, obtained a significance value of 0.003. Overall, the financial performance shown by LDR, NPL, ROA and CAR between conventional banks and Syaria banks is different.


Keywords


konvensional bank; Syaria bank; NPL; LDR; ROA; CAR

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adriyanti, Rini. 2011. Pengaruh NPL dan LDR terhadap ROA pada Bank BUMN di Indonesia. Skripsi. Universitas Hasanuddin. Makasar.

Bank Indonesia. 2011. Booklet Perbankan Indonesia. Vol. 8 Maret 2011.

Bank Indonesia. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.13/1/PBI/2011 tentang Sistem Penilaian Kesehatan Bank Umum dengan RGEC. Jakarta: BI, 2011.

Budisantoso, Totok dan Sigit Triandaru, 2006. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Edisi Dua. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Daniswara, Fitria, dan Nurmadi Harsa Sumarta, 2016. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Berdasarkan RGEC pada Bank Umum Konvensional dan Bank Umum Syariah Periode 2011-2014. Jurnal Gema Vol.51, Februari-Juli 2016.

Dewi, Dian Masita, 2016. Kinerja Keuangan Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah. Jurnal Al-Ulum Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol.1, No.2, April. Fitriana, Nur. 2015. Analisis Komparasi Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Syariah dengan Bank Umum Konvensional Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) Periode Tahun 2012-2014. e-Jurnal IAIN Pekalongan.

Harahap, Sofyan S, Wiroso dan Muhammad Yusuf, 2010. Akutansi Perbankan Syariah. Jakarta: LPFE-Usakti.

Hidayatika, Sita Ayu. 2016. Analisis Perbedaan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Konvensional dengan menggunakan Metode RGEC (Studi pada Bank Konvensional yang listing di BEI 2011-2014). Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim. Malang.

Iriyadi dan Oktafiyanthi, Arinta. 2007. Pengakuan Pendapatan: Studi Komparasi Pada Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah Studi Kasus pada PT. Bank Jabar Bogor. Jurnal Ilmiah Ranggagading Vol.7, No.1, pp.19- 22.

Lupa, Wilson, Tommy Parengkuan dan Jantje Sepang. 2016. Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Perbankan Syariah dengan Perbankan Konvensional dengan Metode Camel. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi Vol.16 No.01, 2016.

Nofinawati, N. 2016. Perkembangan Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 14(2), 168-183.

Nugraha, Damara Andri. 2014. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah dengan Bank Konvensional. Skripsi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Putri, Yudiana Febrita, Isti Fadah, dan Tatok Endhiarto, 2015. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah. Jurnal Jeam Vol. XIV April 2015.

Sugari, Bella Puspita, Bambang Sunarko, Yayat Giyatno, 2015. Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah dan Konvensional dengan menggunakan Metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Governance, Earnings, dan Capital). Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No.13/24/ DPNP. Sistem Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Tanggal 25 Oktober 2011.

Syukron, Ali. 2013. Dinamika Perkembangan Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam Vol.3, No.2.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. 2016. Laporan Keuangan Perbankan. http://www. ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/datadan-statistik/laporan-keuanganperbankan/default.aspx# Diakses tanggal 01 Desember 2016 pukul 15.10 WIB.

Nafiun. 2017. Persamaan dan Perbedaan Bank Syariah dan Konvensional. http://www.nafiun.com/2014/03/persamaan-dan-perbedaan-banksyariah-dan-konvensional.html Diakses tanggal 05 April 2017 pukul 15.35 WIB.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35917/tb.v19i2.171

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN 1411-6375. joomla visitors View My Stats